Real Work AI Coding: Deepseek vs ChatGPT vs Claude
Summary Content
# Real Work AI Coding: Deepseek vs ChatGPT vs Claude
## Video Overview
This video presents a real-world frontend development scenario where the author tests four mainstream AI coding assistants (GPT-4o-mini, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Deepseek V3, and Deepseek R1) with identical code refactoring tasks while integrating Baidu Analytics into a Vue3 project. The comparison provides valuable insights into each AI's practical coding capabilities.
---
## Test Scenario & Task
**Development Context**: The author needed to refactor scattered Baidu Analytics code from `main.ts` and `router/index.ts` into a centralized `tongji.ts` file for better maintainability.
**Code Complexity Factors**:
- Vue3 production environment detection
- Global variable handling (`window._hmt`)
- Async logic in route guards
- Nested conditional statements
- Redundant parameters and async keywords requiring optimization
**Prompting Strategy**: The author used concise prompts without excessive details to test each AI's contextual understanding capabilities.
---
## Detailed AI Performance Analysis
### 🥇 GPT-4o-mini (1st Place)
**Strengths**:
- ✅ Successfully modularized code into three independent functions
- ✅ Intelligently removed redundant if-nesting
- ✅ Automatically optimized unnecessary async keywords and parameters
- ✅ Correctly understood Vue Router navigation guard mechanisms
- ✅ Even caught and corrected typos in the author's code (main.ts naming error)
- ✅ Provided alternative solutions (`return true` vs `next()`)
**Code Quality**: Well-structured, production-ready with minimal adjustments
**Best For**: Production environment refactoring requiring high-quality output
---
### 🥈 Deepseek R1 (2nd Place)
**Strengths**:
- ✅ Similar to GPT-4o-mini in handling if-nesting optimization
- ✅ Added TypeScript global variable declarations (`declare global`)
- ✅ **Unique Advantage**: Displays complete reasoning process—extremely valuable for learners
- ✅ Provided detailed code explanations and best practice recommendations
**Areas for Improvement**:
- ⚠️ Didn't remove redundant async and some parameters
- ⚠️ Contains duplicate if-checks (already present in track page view)
- ⚠️ Unnecessary blank lines in code
**Special Feature**: Visible reasoning process ideal for learning and understanding AI logic
---
### 🥉 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (3rd Place)
**Performance Characteristics**:
- ✅ Code runs successfully with complete basic functionality
- ⚠️ Didn't fully consolidate code as requested (routing logic remained in router/index.ts)
- ⚠️ Preserved original if-nesting without optimization
- ⚠️ Didn't remove redundant parameters and async keywords
**Assessment**: Functionally adequate but lacks optimization compared to top performers
---
### 4️⃣ Deepseek V3 (4th Place)
**Performance Characteristics**:
- ⚠️ Extremely fast response (1-2 seconds) but compromised quality
- ⚠️ Nearly copied original code with minimal refactoring
- ⚠️ Failed to identify redundant parameters and logic issues
- ⚠️ Didn't achieve proper code encapsulation and modularization
**Assessment**: Not suitable for actual code refactoring work
---
## Key Findings & Recommendations
### Code Quality Ranking
1. **GPT-4o-mini** - Best choice, most comprehensive optimization
2. **Deepseek R1** - Close second, high learning value
3. **Claude 3.5** - Mid-tier, usable but requires manual optimization
4. **Deepseek V3** - Not recommended for production environments
### Deepseek R1's Unique Value Proposition
- **Reasoning Visualization**: Complete inference chain transparency
- **Educational Merit**: Helps beginners understand refactoring logic
- **Debug-Friendly**: Makes AI logical gaps easily identifiable
### Usage Recommendations
- **Production Environment**: Prioritize GPT-4o-mini
- **Learning Scenarios**: Leverage Deepseek R1's reasoning process
- **Rapid Prototyping**: Claude 3.5 is acceptable
- **Avoid**: Deepseek V3 for code refactoring tasks
---
## Technical Stack Covered
Vue3, TypeScript, Router Guards, Baidu Analytics Integration, Code Refactoring Patterns, AI-Assisted Development
---
## SEO Keywords
AI coding comparison, ChatGPT vs Claude, Deepseek R1 review, Vue3 code refactoring, AI code assistant, frontend development tools, GPT-4o-mini, LLM programming capabilities, real-world development scenarios, AI pair programming, code optimization
Related Contents
Is the Antigravity Pro Quota I...
Duration: 00:00 | DPGoogle AI IDE Antigravity: Dee...
Duration: 00:00 | DPClaude Opus 4.6 on Antigravity...
Duration: 00:00 | DPAntigravity Not Working? Solve...
Duration: 00:00 | DPAI Showdown: Codex 5.3 vs. Opu...
Duration: 00:00 | DPAntigravity Skills Beginner's ...
Duration: 00:00 | DPThe Ultimate Guide to Customiz...
Duration: 00:00 | DPDeep Dive: Google AI IDE Antig...
Duration: 00:00 | DPAntigravity Quota Drastically ...
Duration: 00:00 | DPAntigravity Perfect Dark Theme...
Duration: 00:00 | DPAntigravity Quota In-Depth Ana...
Duration: 00:00 | DPAntigravity Tip: Disable Autom...
Duration: 00:00 | DPRecommended
Claude Code with DeepSeek v3.1...
06:04 | 368How to integrate DeepSeek v3.1 API into Claude Cod...
Synology DSM Built-in Reverse ...
03:51 | 292How to use the built-in reverse proxy feature in S...
Claude Code Conversation Recov...
02:48 | 269Methods for restoring interrupted conversations in...
View HDD SMART Info on Synolog...
12:19 | 480How to use the command line to check hard drive SM...